1 option
Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than Treaties
ProQuest Congressional Research Digital Collection: Part C (2011 forward) Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. American Law Division
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Congress--Rules and practice.
- United States.
- Commercial treaties.
- Executive-legislative relations.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Contained In:
- ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection
- Place of Publication:
- [United States] [publisher not identified] 2011
- Summary:
- Discusses why trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, World Trade Organization agreements, and bilateral free trade agreements, have been treated as Congressional-executive agreements subject to a majority vote of both houses of Congress rather than as treaties requiring a two-thirds vote of the Senate
- Notes:
- CRS Report
- Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed May 2014). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC
- Vendor supplied data
- Other Format:
- Microfiche version Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. American Law Division. Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than Treaties
- Publisher Number:
- CRS-2013-AML-0102
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.