Hudson v. Michigan The Exclusionary Rule's Applicability to "Knock-and-Announce" Violations

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Constitutional law.

Evidence.

Searches and seizures.

Physical Description:

1 online resource

Contained In:

ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection

Place of Publication:

[Place of publication not identified] [publisher not identified] 2006

Summary:

Discusses 2006 Supreme Court decision in Hudson volume Michigan, in which the Court narrowed the applicability of Fourth Amendment-based exclusionary rule, which generally states that evidence secured in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable search and seizures may not be used against the defendant in Federal or State criminal trials

Notes:

CRS Report

Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC

Vendor supplied data

Other Format:

Microfiche version Library of Congress Congressional Research Service Hudson v Michigan

Publisher Number:

CRS-2006-AML-0261

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license