Multi-criteria Evaluation of Green Power Supply Paths for Pinglu Canal Project During Construction China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design

Format:

Book

Conference/Event

Author/Creator:

Huang, Zeyi, author.

Wei, Yuchen, author.

Li, Xiayang, author.

Wang, Cuixian, author.

Conference Name:

2025 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Development and Energy Resources (SDER 2025) (2025-08-01 : Shenzhen, China)

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Optimization.

Sustainable development.

Logistics.

Research and development.

Solar energy.

Measurements.

Weather and climate.

Local Subjects:

Optimization.

Sustainable development.

Logistics.

Research and development.

Solar energy.

Measurements.

Weather and climate.

Physical Description:

1 online resource

Place of Publication:

Warrendale, PA SAE International 2026

Summary:

In the context of the global active response to climate change and the strong advocacy of green development, China's energy industry is demonstrating a steadfast commitment to low-carbon transformation. In this process, green power trading has gained significant development by virtue of its unique advantages and potential. In this process, green power trading has gained significant development by virtue of its unique advantages and potential. The core objective of the Pinglu Canal Project, a pivotal initiative promoting green and low-carbon development in the region, is to establish a "net-zero carbon" initiative by facilitating the supply of green energy throughout its entire life cycle. This initiative is designed to promote a green and low-carbon transition. This paper conducts an in-depth study on the green power supply path during the construction period of the Pinglu Canal project, and proposes four practicable options. In order to scientifically and objectively determine the optimal path, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system and a TOPSIS evaluation method based on comprehensive weights. The system encompasses the four dimensions of feasibility, economy, technology, and demonstration, enabling a comprehensive and precise evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of each path. The findings of the empirical analysis demonstrate that the combined scores of Path 1 (participation in green power trading), Path 2 (purchase of thermal power with green certificates), Path 3 (rooftop distributed photovoltaic system and purchase of new energy power), and Path 4 (rooftop distributed PV system and purchase of thermal power with green certificates) are 0.8166, 0.7486, 0.2197, and 0.2885, respectively. The comparative analysis reveals that participation in green power trading is the optimal strategy for the project's construction period

Notes:

Vendor supplied data

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license