My Account Log in

1 option

CF-CoT: Enhancing Causal Reasoning in LLMs through Counterfactual Scenarios Hefei University of Technology

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Yang, Jiaoyun, author.
Qi, Botao, author.
Liu, Li, author.
Li, Lian, author.
An, Ning, author.
Conference Name:
Interntional Conference on the New Energy and Intelligent Vehicles (2025-11-02 : Hefei, China)
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Artificial intelligence (AI).
Local Subjects:
Artificial intelligence (AI).
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2026
Summary:
Causal reasoning is the task to identify causal relations between a pair of events in a given context. However, causal reasoning in natural language remains a challenging task for large language models (LLMs), since they tend to mix correlation and causality and exhibit bias in their reasoning, especially by mistaking temporal proximity for causal relations. The problem is exacerbated by the models' propensity to generate spurious justifications that confuses co-occurrence rather than actual causal relationships. Although CoT prompting has shown effectiveness in enhancing multi-step reasoning, it is prone to hallucination and spurious inferences, which generally dampens their capability to provide correct causal explanations. The variant of CoT, CoT-SC, is a more promising attempt at yielding consistent outputs by randomly sampling multiple reasoning paths, and voting for the most probable answer. However, for its implementation, CoT-SC also demands expensive computations. The prompting strategy that we propose in the current work, named as CF-CoT, aims to enable the LLMs to leverage causal reasoning on the explicit consideration of counterfactual worlds that they may have ignored to facilitate the reasoning task, mirroring how humans use "what-if" reasoning in day-to-day thinking. Our framework motivates models to distinguish real causal relations from mere correlations by studying how changing things hypothetically would affect them. Comprehensive experiments on two event-level causal reasoning benchmarksEventStoryLine and e-CAREshow that CF-CoT, to some extent, enhance the performance in terms of causal inference accuracy and robustness over standard CoT and other baselines
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account