1 option
The Necessity of a Holistic Safety Evaluation Framework for AI-Based Automation Features Qualcomm Technologies, Incorporated
- Format:
- Book
- Conference/Event
- Author/Creator:
- Abbaspour, Ali Reza, author.
- Mahadevan, Shabin, author.
- Zwirglmaier, Kilian, author.
- Stafford, Jeff, author.
- Conference Name:
- WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2026-04-14 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Driving automation.
- Safety critical systems.
- Artificial intelligence (AI).
- Safety regulations and standards.
- Automated vehicles.
- Quality control.
- Risk assessments.
- Quality management systems.
- Local Subjects:
- Driving automation.
- Safety critical systems.
- Artificial intelligence (AI).
- Safety regulations and standards.
- Automated vehicles.
- Quality control.
- Risk assessments.
- Quality management systems.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 2026
- Summary:
- The intersection of Safety of Intended Functionality (SOTIF) and Functional Safety (FuSa) analysis of driving automation features has traditionally excluded Quality Management (QM) components from rigorous safety impact evaluations. While QM components are not typically classified as safety-relevant, recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) integration reveal that such components can contribute to SOTIF-related hazardous risks. Compliance with emerging AI safety standards, such as ISO/PAS 8800, necessitates re-evaluating safety considerations for these components. This paper examines the necessity of conducting holistic safety analysis and risk assessment on AI components, emphasizing their potential to introduce hazards with the capacity to violate risk acceptance criteria when deployed in safety-critical driving systems, particularly in perception algorithms. Using case studies, we demonstrate how deficiencies in AI-driven perception systems can emerge even in QM-classified components, leading to unintended functional behaviors with critical safety implications. By bridging theoretical analysis with practical examples, this paper argues for the adoption of comprehensive FuSa, SOTIF, and AI standards-driven methodologies to identify and mitigate risks in AI components. The findings demonstrate the importance of revising existing safety frameworks to address the evolving challenges posed by AI, ensuring comprehensive safety assurance across all component classifications spanning multiple safety standards
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.