1 option
Multimodality imaging. Volume 1, Deep learning applications. / Jasjit S. Suri and Mainak Biswas.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Suri, Jasjit S., author.
- Biswas, Mainak, author.
- Series:
- IOP Ebooks Series
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Biomedical engineering.
- Computer vision.
- Deep learning (Machine learning).
- Diagnostic imaging--Data processing.
- Diagnostic imaging.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (354 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- Bristol, England : IOP Publishing, [2022]
- Summary:
- This book provides technical details of the application of deep learning and machine learning in medical imaging for diagnosis brain, cardiovascular, liver, lung diseases. The text also explores the technical and ethical aspects of deep learning and machine learning applications in medical imaging.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Purpose
- Content and organization
- Editor biographies
- Mainak Biswas
- Jasjit S Suri
- List of contributors
- Chapter 1 Deep learning and augmented radiology
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 The present
- 1.2.1 Fatty liver disease risk stratification
- 1.2.2 Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurement using DL for segmentation
- 1.2.3 Assessment of the treatment effects in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using DL from MR images
- 1.2.4 Diagnosis of prostate cancer using DL
- 1.2.5 CT-based respiratory disease prognosis using DL
- 1.3 Future
- 1.3.1 DL in radiology
- 1.3.2 The future of radiology
- 1.4 The potential of deep learning
- 1.4.1 Economy
- 1.4.2 Augmented radiology and DL
- 1.4.3 Further development of DL
- 1.5 Challenges and risks in DL
- 1.5.1 Safety
- 1.5.2 Privacy
- 1.5.3 Legality
- 1.6 Conclusion
- References
- Chapter 2 Deep learning in biomedical imaging
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Deep learning models
- 2.2.1 Deep belief networks
- 2.2.2 Autoencoder
- 2.2.3 Convolutional neural networks
- 2.2.4 Deep residual network
- 2.3 DL based biomedical imaging systems
- 2.3.1 Cardiovascular application
- 2.3.2 Neurology application
- 2.3.3 Mammography application
- 2.3.4 Microscopy applications
- 2.3.5 Dermatology application
- 2.3.6 Gastroenterology applications
- 2.3.7 Pulmonary application
- 2.4 Discussion
- 2.4.1 Graphics processing unit and open-source software for deep learning
- Chapter 3 A review of artificial intelligence in brain tumor classification and segmentation
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Brain cancer pathophysiology
- 3.2.1 Architecture at the cellular level
- 3.2.2 Links between brain tumors and genes
- 3.3 Imaging modality
- 3.3.1 Computed tomography imaging
- 3.3.2 Magnetic resonance imaging
- 3.3.3 Biopsy
- 3.3.4 Hyperstereoscopy imaging.
- 3.3.5 MR spectroscopy
- 3.4 Guidelines for tumor grading by the WHO
- 3.5 Brain tumor tests
- 3.5.1 Biomarker test
- 3.5.2 Biopsy
- 3.5.3 Imaging test
- 3.6 Classification methods
- 3.6.1 Machine learning
- 3.6.2 Deep learning
- 3.6.3 Brain image analysis using deep learning
- 3.6.4 A plausible solution for brain cancer classification
- 3.7 Brain cancer and other brain disorders
- 3.7.1 Stroke
- 3.7.2 Alzheimer's disease
- 3.7.3 Parkinson's disease
- 3.7.4 Leukoaraiosis
- 3.7.5 Multiple sclerosis
- 3.7.6 Wilson's disease
- 3.8 Discussion
- 3.8.1 A note on cancer detection biomarkers
- 3.9 Conclusion
- Chapter 4 MRI based brain tumor classification and its validation: a transfer learning paradigm
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 Background literature survey
- 4.3 Demographics and data preparation
- 4.3.1 Patient demographics
- 4.3.2 Data preparation
- 4.4 Methodology
- 4.4.1 CNN model
- 4.4.2 The architecture of AlexNet
- 4.4.3 Transfer learning and workflow
- 4.4.4 Weight optimization
- 4.4.5 A generalization system for tumor classification
- 4.5 Experimental protocol, results, and performance evaluation
- 4.5.1 Parameter selection and simulation
- 4.5.2 Results
- 4.5.3 Performance evaluation
- 4.6 Model validation and verification
- 4.6.1 Hypothesis validation
- 4.6.2 Software verification
- 4.7 Discussion
- 4.8 Conclusion
- Appendix A
- Chapter 5 Magnetic resonance based Wilson's disease tissue characterization in an artificial intelligence framework using transfer learning
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 Background literature
- 5.3 Methodology
- 5.3.1 Patient demographics
- 5.3.2 Data augmentation
- 5.3.3 Pre-processing: skull and background removal
- 5.4 Global architecture: transfer learning
- 5.4.1 AlexNet
- 5.4.2 ResNet50
- 5.4.3 DenseNet161
- 5.4.4 XceptionNet.
- 5.4.5 InceptionV3
- 5.4.6 SivaSuriNet
- 5.5 Results
- 5.6 Characterization
- 5.6.1 Mean feature strength
- 5.6.2 Higher-order spectrum
- 5.7 Discussion
- 5.8 Conclusion
- Chapter 6 Artificial intelligence based carotid plaque tissue characterisation and classification from ultrasound images using a deep learning paradigm
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Methodology
- 6.2.1 Patient demographics
- 6.2.2 Exclusion criteria
- 6.2.3 Ultrasound data acquisition and preprocessing
- 6.2.4 Plaque delineation
- 6.2.5 Ultrasound plaque data augmentation
- 6.2.6 Supercomputer specifications
- 6.2.7 Deep learning architecture
- 6.2.8 Experimental protocol
- 6.2.9 Machine learning for benchmarking deep learning
- 6.2.10 Performance parameters using the DL and ML methods
- 6.3 Results
- 6.3.1 Deep learning data analysis and benchmarking against machine learning
- 6.3.2 Plaque characterisation in a deep learning framework
- 6.4 Discussion
- 6.4.1 A note on the unbalanced datasets for symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques
- 6.4.2 Benchmarking against techniques available in the literature
- 6.4.3 A special note on the comparison of supercomputer hardware to a local machine
- 6.4.4 Strengths, weaknesses, and extensions
- 6.5 Conclusion
- Disclosure/Conflict of interest
- Appendix
- Chapter 7 Quantification of plaque volume using a two-stage deep learning paradigm
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 Background
- 7.3 Data acquisition
- 7.4 Methodology
- 7.5 Experimental protocol and results
- 7.6 Statistical tests
- 7.7 Discussion
- 7.8 Conclusion
- Chapter 8 Stenosis measurement from ultrasound carotid artery images in the deep learning paradigm
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Patient demographics and image acquisition
- 8.3 Methodology
- 8.4 Experimental protocol, performance parameters, and results.
- 8.5 Statistical tests, variability and error bias analysis, and risk characterization
- 8.6 Discussion
- 8.7 Conclusion
- Chapter 9 A systematic review of conventional and deep learning models for the measurement of plaque burden
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.2 Chronological generation of cIMT regional segmentation and cIMT measurement
- 9.3 Ml application for cIMT and PA measurement
- 9.3.1 ANN model for cIMT region detection
- 9.3.2 Extreme learning machine radial basis neural network model for cIMT region detection
- 9.3.3 Fuzzy K-means classifier for cIMT region extraction
- 9.4 Deep learning application for cIMT and PA extraction
- 9.4.1 ANN autoencoder based cIMT region segmentation
- 9.4.2 Fully convolutional network for cIMT region estimation
- 9.4.3 FCN for PA measurement
- 9.4.4 Two-stage patching based AI model for cIMT and PA measurement
- 9.5 Discussion
- 9.5.1 Benchmarking
- 9.5.2 A short note on cardiovascular risk assessment
- 9.5.3 A note on the clinical impact of AI methods on cIMT/PA techniques
- 9.5.4 A note on inter- and intra-observer variability analysis on the evaluation of AI models
- 9.5.5 A short note on 10 year risk estimation using cIMT and PA
- 9.5.6 Statistical power analysis and diagnostic-odds ratio
- 9.6 Conclusions
- Appendix A Mathematical representations of the ML and DL paradigms
- Chapter 10 Ultrasound fatty liver disease risk stratification using an extreme learning machine framework
- 10.1 Introduction
- 10.2 Data demographics, collection, and preparation
- 10.2.1 Sub-sampling of US datasets (S4 and S8)
- 10.3 Methodology
- 10.3.1 The three-layered ELM architecture
- 10.3.2 Tissue characterization and risk stratification using ELM and SVM frameworks
- 10.3.3 Feature mining
- 10.4 Experimental protocol.
- 10.4.1 Experiment 1: the effect of the size of the training data on accuracy using four CV protocols
- 10.4.2 Experiment 2: the effect of the training set size using the sub-sampling strategy
- 10.4.3 Experiment 3: ELM and SVM time complexity
- 10.5 Results
- 10.5.1 Experiment 1: the effect of training data size on accuracy using the four CV protocols
- 10.5.2 Experiment 2: the effect of the training data size in parts during the CV protocols
- 10.5.3 Experiment 3: time comparison between ELM and SVM
- 10.6 Performance evaluations
- 10.6.1 ROC curves
- 10.6.2 Reliability and stability analysis
- 10.7 Discussion
- 10.7.1 Benchmarking
- 10.7.2 ELM and BPNN comparison
- 10.7.3 A special note on the ELM and SVM
- 10.7.4 Strengths, weaknesses, and future work
- 10.8 Conclusions
- Appendix A Scientific validation
- Appendix B Results of the ELM/SVM classifier for the S4 and S8 datasets
- Chapter 11 Symtosis: deep learning based liver ultrasound tissue characterisation and risk stratification
- 11.1 Introduction
- 11.2 Patient demographics and acquisition
- 11.3 Methodology
- 11.3.1 Risk stratification model
- 11.3.2 CNN architecture
- 11.4 Results
- 11.4.1 Image pre-processing for the DL, ELM, and SVM
- 11.4.2 The effect of data size on stratification accuracy
- 11.4.3 Stratification analysis using the 'liver segregation index'
- 11.5 Performance evaluation: ROC, reliability, and timing analysis
- 11.5.1 ROC analysis
- 11.5.2 Reliability analysis
- 11.5.3 Timing analysis
- 11.6 Discussion
- 11.7 Conclusion
- Chapter 12 Characterization of COVID-19 severity in infected lungs via artificial intelligence transfer learning
- 12.1 Introduction
- 12.2 Methodology
- 12.2.1 Patient demographics
- 12.2.2 Data acquisition
- 12.2.3 Baseline characteristics
- 12.2.4 Segmentation
- 12.2.5 Augmentation.
- 12.2.6 Models.
- Notes:
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Description based on print version record.
- Includes bibliographical references.
- ISBN:
- 9780750343459
- 0750343451
- OCLC:
- 1429723431
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.