1 option
The police, the public, and the pursuit of trust : A cross-national, dynamic study of trust in the police and police trust-building strategies / Dorian Schaap.
- Format:
- Book
- Thesis/Dissertation
- Author/Creator:
- Schaap, Dorian, 1988- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Police--Europe--Case studies.
- Police.
- Police-community relations--Europe--Case studies.
- Police-community relations.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (379 pages)
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- The Hague, The Netherlands : Eleven International Publishing, [2018]
- Summary:
- This book by Dorian Schaap explores the dynamics of trust between the police and the public across Europe. It examines both citizens' trust in the police and the strategies employed by police to build this trust. The study utilizes statistical analyses and case studies, focusing on the historical and contextual factors influencing trust levels. It highlights the importance of understanding trust within national and local contexts and discusses strategies in England, Wales, Denmark, and the Netherlands. The book is intended for scholars, policymakers, and police officers interested in improving police-community relations. Generated by AI.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Preface
- Table of Contents
- Tables and figures
- Part I Introduction and theories
- 1 Introduction and research questions
- 1.1 Trust and the police as representatives of societal order
- 1.2 Gaps in our knowledge
- 1.3 Research questions
- 1.4 Outline of the study
- 2 Central concepts
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Trust and confidence
- 2.3 Legitimacy
- 2.4 Other notions
- 3 An introduction to the three theoretical perspectives
- 3.1 Understanding trust in the police
- 3.2 Three paradigms of thinking about trust and trust-building
- 3.2.1 Proto-trust-building: Professional policing
- 3.3 The emergence of proximity policing approaches
- 3.4 Instrumentalism
- 3.5 Procedural justice theory and fair treatment
- 3.6 Concluding remarks
- Part II Public trust in the police
- 4 Research design and hypotheses
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 The problem of measurement equivalence
- 4.2.1 The researcher: Translation and understanding
- 4.2.2 The police: Function, structure, and culture
- 4.2.3 The public: Expectations and fears
- 4.2.4 Measurement equivalence in previous research
- 4.2.5 Testing for measurement equivalence in the present study
- 4.3 Perspectives on differences and developments in trust in different countries
- 4.3.1 Understanding change
- 4.3.2 The desacralization thesis
- 4.3.3 The safety utopia thesis
- 4.3.4 The post-authoritarian paradox thesis
- 4.3.5 The socioeconomic crisis problem
- 4.4 Perspectives on explaining differences between countries
- 4.4.1 Proximity policing
- 4.4.2 Instrumentalism
- 4.4.3 Procedural justice
- 4.4.4 Other determinants and control variables
- 4.4.5 An explanatory model of trust in the police
- 4.5 Concluding remarks
- 5 Describing developments in trust in the police in Europe from 1981 until 2014.
- 5.1 Data and measurements: The European Values Study and the European Social Survey
- 5.1.1 The European Values Study (EVS)
- 5.1.2 The European Social Survey (ESS)
- 5.2 The measurement equivalence of the ESS and EVS: Main findings
- 5.2.1 Multi-group structural equation modeling
- 5.2.2 Longitudinal measurement equivalence of the EVS, 1981-2008
- 5.2.3 Longitudinal measurement equivalence of the ESS, 2002-2014
- 5.2.4 Cross-national measurement equivalence of the ESS, 2010
- 5.3 Describing developments in trust in different countries
- 5.3.1 Long-term developments: The EVS
- 5.3.2 Medium-term developments: The ESS
- 5.3.3 Intermezzo: Trends in trust in the police compared to other institutions
- 5.4 Conclusions
- 6 Explaining differences in trust in the police between European countries
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Differences in levels of trust between countries in 2010
- 6.3 Operationalization
- 6.4 Explaining trust in the police in 2010
- 6.4.1 National-level determinants
- 6.4.2 Individual-level determinants
- 6.5 Intermediary variables
- 6.5.1 Proximity policing: Prevention of crime
- 6.5.2 Instrumentalism: Catching burglars and rapid response
- 6.5.3 Procedural justice: Accepting bribes and the procedural justice scale
- 6.6 Main results: Reflecting on the hypotheses
- 6.7 Country-specific effects
- 6.8 Concluding remarks
- Part III Police trust-building strategies
- 7 Introduction, theory, and methods
- 7.1 Introduction and research questions
- 7.2 Theory: Understanding trust-building strategies
- 7.2.1 Problem definition, policy generation, and political events
- 7.2.2 Problem recognition: The invention of trust
- 7.2.3 Policy generation: The design of trust-building strategies
- 7.2.4 Political events and changing contexts
- 7.2.5 A comparative analysis of trust-building
- 7.3 Methodology.
- 7.3.1 Case selection
- 7.3.2 Data collection
- 7.3.3 Analytical approach
- 8 England &
- Wales
- 8.1 The foundations of police work
- 8.2 Police work in the postwar decades
- 8.3 The 1980s: The Brixton riots, the Scarman report, and the invention of trust
- 8.4 The 1980s: Initial trust-building strategies and the miners' strike
- 8.5 The 1990s: Fighting crime and performance targets
- 8.6 Another view of the 1990s: 'Institutional racism'
- 8.7 The 2000s: PCSOs, reassurance policing, and neighbourhood policing
- 8.8 From 2010 onward: Conservative-led governments
- 8.9 Conclusions
- 9 Denmark
- 9.1 The foundations of Danish police work
- 9.2 Police until the 1970s
- 9.3 The 1970s and 1980s: Careful reform
- 9.4 The 1990s: Trust invented?
- 9.5 The proximity policing experiments of the late 1990s
- 9.6 The 2000s: Toward a new model of policing
- 9.7 After the 2007 police reform
- 9.7.1 Short-term impact
- 9.7.2 Local policing and satisfaction
- 9.7.3 Ethnic tensions and trust
- 9.7.4 Proximity policing returns
- 9.8 Since 2012: The Independent Police Complaints Commission
- 9.9 Conclusions
- 10 The Netherlands
- 10.1 The foundations of police work and the 1950s
- 10.2 The 1960s and 1970s: A crisis of authority
- 10.3 Changing police
- 10.4 The reorganization of 1993 and the blossoming of proximity policing
- 10.5 Fighting crime, New Public Management, and targets
- 10.6 The national police
- 10.6.1 The political background
- 10.6.2 Trust in the national police
- 10.6.3 More distant police?
- 10.7 Procedural justice
- 10.8 Conclusions
- 11 Comparing the three case studies
- 11.1 Introduction
- 11.2 Research Question 4: Defining the problem of trust
- 11.2.1 Framing trust: Words and meanings
- 11.2.2 Problems and problem definitions
- 11.3 Research Question 5: Strategies and solutions.
- 11.3.1 Different strategies
- 11.3.2 Policy generation and how trust-building strategies come about
- 11.4 Research Question 6: Understanding differences
- 11.4.1 The local and national context and agency
- 11.4.2 Policy transfer and foreign imports
- 11.4.3 Switching strategies
- 11.4.4 Convergence of trust-building strategies?
- Part IV Conclusions
- 12 Conclusions and discussion
- 12.1 Summary: Main findings
- 12.2 The public
- 12.3 The police
- 12.4 The pursuit of trust
- 12.5 Chasing knowledge 293 Samenvatting
- References
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- B.1 Basic model structure
- B.2 Longitudinal equivalence tests, EVS 1981-2008
- B.3 Longitudinal equivalence tests, EVS 1981-2008, on the Baltic states
- B.4 Cross-national EVS measurement equivalence results
- Appendix C
- Appendix D
- Appendix E
- Appendix F
- F.1 Questionnaire development
- F.2 Robustness checks in the analyses
- Appendix G
- Curriculum Vitae.
- Notes:
- Ph. D. Radboud University, Nijmegen 2017
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Part of the metadata in this record was created by AI, based on the text of the resource.
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 9789462748507
- 9462748500
- OCLC:
- 1124608729
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.