1 option
Protecting life : the ethics of police deadly force / Ben Jones.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Jones, Ben, 1985- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Police--United States.
- Police.
- Police brutality.
- Police shootings.
- Police-community relations.
- United States.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2026]
- Summary:
- The idea that police should prioritize protecting life seems obvious. Many use-of-force policies already endorse the principle. But despite general support for this principle in and out of policing, figuring out what exactly it means in practice proves far more challenging. In 'Protecting Life', Ben Jones takes up that challenge and provides strategies for navigating it.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Introduction
- The Scope of the Problem
- Common Ground in a Polarized Debate
- Policing and Distributive Justice
- Should Different Rules Apply to Police?
- Some Remarks on Methodology
- Key Terms
- Overview of What's to Come
- PART I Ethical Framework for Deadly Force
- 1 Self-Defense, Policing, and War
- Defensive Force
- Core Justificatory Criteria: Just Aim, Proportionality, and Necessity
- Which Aims Justify Police Deadly Force?
- What Policing Shares with Self-Defense
- What Policing Shares with War.
- Policing as Its Own Domain of Defensive Force
- 2 The Priority of Protecting Life
- A Principle with Broad Support
- The Right to Life
- Puzzle 1: Nonlethal Threats that Justify Deadly Force
- Puzzle 2: Balancing the Right to Life with Other Rights
- Puzzle 3: Weighing Lives Under Uncertainty
- A More Nuanced Account of Prioritizing the Protection of Life
- 3 Distributive Justice and Deadly Force
- Distributive Justice
- A Muddled Debate: Distributive Justice and Defensive Force
- Micro- and Macro-Level Justice
- Culpability's Importance for Micro-Level Justice.
- Vulnerability's Importance for Macro-Level Justice
- Police's Role in Advancing Distributive Justice
- PART II Contemporary Challenges
- 4 Aggressors with Mental Illness
- Culpability, Vulnerability, and Mental Illness
- Proposal 1: Diminished Protections Account
- Proposal 2: Traditional Account
- Proposal 3: Culpability Account
- Proposal 4: Vulnerability Account
- Proposal 5: Fusion Account
- Addressing Objections to the Fusion Account
- Implications for Police Administrators
- Implications for Officers
- Implications for the Law
- 5 Racial Disparities in Police Deadly Force.
- What the Data Say
- Explanation 1: Individual Bias
- Explanation 2: Disparate Enforcement
- Explanation 3: Differential Involvement Hypothesis
- The Moral Issues at Stake in the Debate over Racial Disparities
- Structural Racism's Link to Violent Crime
- Implications for Police Reform
- The Limits of Police Reform
- 6 Police-Generated Killings
- Obligation to Reduce the Risk of Deadly Force
- The Problem of Police-Generated Killings
- Accountability for Bad Tactics
- Where the Law Falls Short
- The Case and Tools for Reform
- 7 Fleeing "Dangerous" Suspects.
- The Imminence Requirement
- Police's Exemption from the Imminence Requirement
- Garner's Limitations
- Gesturing at the Imminence Requirement
- Move Toward the Imminence Requirement in Policing
- Doing/Allowing Distinction
- Equality Before the Law
- Objection 1: The Imminence Requirement Undermines Respect for the Law
- Objection 2: The Imminence Requirement Undermines the Protection of Life
- Clearer Guidance for Police
- Conclusion
- Appendix Model Deadly Force Policy
- Model Policy
- Acknowledgments
- References
- Index.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on online resource and publisher information; title from PDF title page (Oxford Academic, viewed on July 31, 2026).
- Other Format:
- Print version : Jones, Ben, 1985- Protecting life.
- ISBN:
- 9780197823316
- 0197823319
- OCLC:
- 1574527108
- Publisher Number:
- CIPO000359194
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.