1 option
The Hidden Virtues of Discretionary Power in European Migration Law.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Bornemann, Jonas.
- Series:
- Modern Studies in European Law Series
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (193 pages)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford : Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2026.
- Summary:
- This book explores discretionary decision-making in migration systems in Europe.It investigates how European law influences the existence, exercise and effects of discretion.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Contents
- List of Abbreviations
- List of Primary Sources
- Case Law
- 1. Discretion in European Migration Law: Misfit, Necessity, Virtue?
- I. Discretion and Its Critiques
- II. European Migration Law: The Last Stronghold of Vast Discretionary Power?
- A. Defining Discretion as a Targeted Legal Phenomenon
- B. Of Relics and Revivals: Discretionary Power in European Migration Law
- C. Beyond Sovereign Choice: Explaining the Prominence of Migration Discretion
- III. Discretion and Tempered Executive Dominance: The Transformation of Discretionary Power
- IV. Discretionary Power and the Legal Position of Migrants
- A. Legitimate Interests of Migrants
- B. Relative Improvements for Migrants
- V. Methodology and Research Design
- A. Deductive Reasoning
- B. Course of Investigation
- 2. Discretion: A Conceptual Approximation
- I. Legal Theory on Discretion
- A. Discretion as (Un)fettered Choice
- i. The Residual Thesis
- ii. The Original Thesis
- B. Discretion, Delegation and the Relative Authority of Executives
- C. Discretion, Legality and Judicial Review
- D. Conceptual Allocation of Discretion in the Decision-Making Process
- E. Interim Conclusion
- II. Traditions of Discretion in European Administrative Law
- A. Deliberative Autonomy
- i. Discretiophobia or Discretiophoria?
- ii. Types of Deliberations and Normative Allocations of Discretion
- B. Manifestations in Law
- C. Limited Judicial Review
- i. Varying Degrees of Reduced Intensity Review
- ii. Other Mechanisms Precluding Full Judicial Review
- iii. Limited Review: What Is In a Name?
- III. A Framework Definition of Discretionary Power
- 3. Discretion in European Migration Law: Persistence and Targeted Consolidation.
- I. Discretion to Accommodate European Individualisation Requirements
- A. Fundamental Rights-based Origin of Individualisation Requirements
- B. Individualised Decision-Making and Administrative Autonomy
- i. A Safeguard of Administrative Autonomy
- ii. National Lawmakers and European Individualisation Requirements
- C. Individualised Assessments and Discretionary Power: Two of a Kind?
- i. Implications for the Intensity of Review
- ii. Proliferation of Discretion as a Means to Allow for Administrative Autonomy
- II. EU Migration Law's Vested Interest in Discretion
- A. The Reproduction of an EU-level Tradition of Discretion in National Administrative Contexts
- i. Affirmations of Wide 'Discretion' in the Jurisprudence of the ECJ
- ii. Complexity as a Functional Reason Underpinning Discretion'
- B. Wide Discretion to Safeguard Public Order and Security
- C. Abandoning Conceptual Pluralism? Limited Judicial Review Prescribed
- i. De-Judicialisation by Judicial Means?
- ii. Effective Remedy and the Preclusion of Uncontrolled Discretion
- III. Discretion as a Compensation Valve for Dysfunctional Transnational Administrative Systems
- A. The Dublin Discretionary Clause
- i. Devolvement to Administrative Bodies
- ii. Devolvement and Discretion
- B. Dublin Discretion and Makeshift Crisis Responses
- i. Suspending Dublin by Exercising the Discretionary Clause?
- ii. Ad Hoc Solidarity: The Malta Declaration of 2019
- IV. European Standards Precluding Discretionary Power
- A. Discretion and Asylum Decision-making: A Mismatch?
- i. Safeguards of Administrative Autonomy in Asylum Law: Impartiality and Objectivity
- ii. Full and Ex Nunc Review
- B. The Preclusion of Discretion as a Judicial Strategy?
- i. Judicial Refutation of Deliberate Misconstructions of Discretion in Asylum Law.
- ii. Precluding Discretion in the Name of Migrants' Fundamental Rights: The Case of Return Detention
- V. Interim Conclusion: A Targeted Consolidation of Discretion
- 4. The Transformation of the Exercise of Discretion
- I. From Sovereign Power to Limited Administrative Autonomy and Back: Coming Full Circle?
- A. Unfettered Discretion as an Administrative Anomality
- B. Sovereign Choice and Absolute Discretion: Walking a Thin Line
- II. The Exercise of Discretion as Legally Instructed Decision-Making Freedom
- A. The Duty of Care and the Autonomous Appraisal of Relevance and Fact
- B. The Exercise of Discretion as Weighing of Competing Interests
- III. Transnational Effects of the Exercise of Discretion
- A. Solidarity and the Exercise of Discretion in Make-Shift Crisis Responses?
- B. Mechanisms to Mitigate Adverse Transnational Effects
- i. Transnational Cooperation Mechanisms: A Practical Necessity of Coordinated Exercise of Discretion?
- ii. Duty of Care in the Exercise of Discretion in Transnational Administrative Systems
- C. Politicisation of the Exercise of Discretion in European Migration Law
- IV. Interim Conclusion: Discretion as a Sophisticated Mode of Decision-Making
- 5. Discretion and the Legal Position of Migrants
- I. Between Executive Domination and Individual Protection
- A. Of Outsiders and Insiders: Discretion as a Mediator for Belonging
- B. Discretion and the Termination of Stay: Security and Securitisation
- II. Discretion and Individual Rights of Migrants: An Uneasy Relationship?
- III. Open-Ended Deliberation as Relative Improvement
- A. Discretion as an Avenue of Individualised Justice
- B. Swaying Administrators in Their Exercise of Discretion
- IV. Virtues and Potentials of Legally Instructed Choice
- A. Towards a Migrant-Focused Exercise of Discretion?.
- B. Participatory Elements in the Exercise of Discretion?
- V. Protection Through External Control
- A. Availability of Judicial Protection
- B. Limited Review and Migrants' Chances of Success
- VI. Interim Conclusion: Virtues of Diligently Exercised Discretion
- 6. Conclusion: The Hidden Virtues of Discretion in European Migration Law
- I. Discretion as a Tool to Process the Influences of a Multi-Levelled Legal System
- A. Reasons Underpinning the Targeted Consolidation of Discretion
- B. Pluralism and a European Vested Interest in Discretion
- II. Discretion as a Guarantee of Administrative Flexibility
- III. Discretion and Relative Improvements of Migrants' Legal Position
- IV. Discretion and its Hidden Virtues
- Bibliography
- Index.
- Notes:
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- ISBN:
- 1-5099-8420-8
- 1-5099-8418-6
- OCLC:
- 1583180480
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.