My Account Log in

1 option

Anti-Scientific Americans : The Prevalence, Origins, and Political Consequences of Anti-Intellectualism in the US / Matthew Motta.

Oxford Scholarship Online: Political Science Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Motta, Matt, author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Science--Political aspects--United States.
Science.
Science and state--United States.
Science and state.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (340 pages)
Edition:
First edition.
Place of Publication:
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2024]
Summary:
In Anti-Scientific Americans, Matthew Motta offers new theoretical and data-driven insights into the prevalence, origins, and policy consequences of anti-intellectualism in the US. He brings together "micro-level" survey data from cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys spanning six decades, and aggregated "macro-level" data from hundreds of opinion polls dating back to the 1940s, to show that anti-intellectualism is both a pervasive and pernicious presence in American public life. A methodologically rigorous and empirically powerful account of one the most profound forces in American politics, this book will be of interest to scholars and students throughout the social sciences interested in why experts generate such resentment.
Contents:
Cover
Anti-Scientific Americans : The Prevalence, Origins, and Political Consequences of Anti-Intellectualism in the US
Copyright
Dedication
Acknowledgments
Contents
1: Anti-Scientific Americans?
Conceptualizing Anti-Intellectualism
It's Personal: Anti-Intellectualism as an Affective and Group-Based Phenomenon
Expert Dislike and Distrust
Who Is an Expert? Measuring Anti-Expert Attitudes
Experts and Intellectuals: The Eye of the Beholder Approach
The Scientific Community: A More-Narrow Approach
How Anti-Intellectualism Relates to Populism
What's at Stake?
The Plan of This Book
A Word of Caution: Experts Are People Too
2: The Nature and Origins of Anti-Intellectualism
Understanding Anti-Intellectualism: An Affective and Group-Centric Theory
Psychologically Unpacking the Group-Based Origins of Expert Dislike and Distrust
Applying SIT, SCT, and ITT to Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
The Political Psychological Inputs and Policy-Relevant Outputs of Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Static Inputs: Who Holds Anti-Intellectual Attitudes?
Republican Partisan Identity and Symbolic Ideology
A Hostile Legacy
Connecting Anti-Expert Partisan Rhetoric to Public Opinion
Preferences for Limited Government
Religiosity
The Tea Party and the Temporal Dynamics of Asymmetric Polarization
Dynamic Inputs: What Motivates Change in Anti-Intellectualism?
Knowledge of Basic Scientific Facts
Interest in Scientific Research
Experts' Policy Influence: The Bidirectionality Thesis
Testing the Group-Centric Model: A Preview
3: Validating Two Approaches to Measuring Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement in Public-Opinion Surveys
A Refresher: Two Approaches to Measuring Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
The Public-Opinion Data: An Overview.
GSS Time Series Studies (1974-2018)
GSS Panel Studies (2006-2010, 2008-2012, 2010-2014)
CSPP Panel Study (2016)
ANES Pilot Study (2019) and 2020 Time Series Study
Science and Policy Rolling Cross-Sectional Study (2020-2021)
Validating the Two Micro-Level Indicators of Anti-Intellectualism
Content Validation, Part 1: Americans' Definitions of Expertise and How Scientists Contribute to It
Content Validation, Part 2: How Anti-Intellectual Thought Underpins Evaluations of Scientists
Convergent Validation: Assessing the Empirical Overlap between the Two Measures
Conclusion
4: The Prevalence of Anti-Intellectual Attitudes
Macro Anti-Intellectualism Database (1944-2021)
The Problem with Prevalence
A Pervasive Problem or an Overhyped Myth?
A Pluralistic Prevalence Assessment
5: Origin Story Part I: Explaining Between-Person Differences in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Analytical Strategy: Detecting Between-Person Differences in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Measures and Data
Model Input Stability Assessment
Results
Partisan Identity
Ideology
Limited-Government Attitudes
Reverse Causality Assessment
"Taxed Enough by Academics?" Attitude Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party
6: Origin Story Part II: Change in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
Analytical Strategy
Data and Measures
Exploring the Effects of Expert Contact in Higher-Educational Settings
7: The Bidirectionality Thesis: Hofstadter's Forgotten Prediction
Testing the Bidirectionality Thesis
Data
Measuring General Expert Policy Role Orientations
8: Anti-Intellectualism and Its Pernicious Policy Consequences.
Anti-Intellectualism and the Rejection of Evidence-Based Policy
Climate Science
Public Health
Economics
Elite Responsiveness to Public Anti-Intellectualism
Measuring Expert Influence in the Policymaking Process
Robustness Checks
9: What's Next, Doc?
Just Asking Questions: Emerging Strains of Anti-Intellectualism
Toward a Unified Approach for Improving Trust in Experts
Restoring Faith in Experts: A Unified Approach
A Brief Note on System-Level Reforms
Is American Anti-Intellectualism Exceptional?
Limitations and Directions for Future Research
It's Personal: Concluding Reflections on the State of Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement in the United States
APPENDIX MATERIALS FOR "Anti-Scientific Americans: The Prevalence, Origins, and Political Consequences of Anti-Intellectualism in the US"
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 3
Technical Compendium to Chapter Three
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 4
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 5
Variable Measurement
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 6
Science Knowledge Test (Question Wording and Coding Protocol)
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 7
Supplementary Materials for Chapter 8
References
Index.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
Description based on print version record.
ISBN:
0-19-778882-3
OCLC:
1437533816

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account