My Account Log in

1 option

Trade and Environment: Bargaining Outcomes from Linked Negotiations / Lisandro Abrego, Carlo Perroni, John Whalley, Randall M. Wigle.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Abrego, Lisandro.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Perroni, Carlo.
Whalley, John.
Wigle, Randall M.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w6216.
NBER working paper series no. w6216
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
International trade--Environmental aspects.
International trade.
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Trade and Environment
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1997.
Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
Summary:
Recent literature has explored both physical and policy linkage between trade and environment. Here we explore linkage through leverage in bargaining, whereby developed countries can use trade policy threats to achieve improved developing country environmental management, while developing countries can use environmental concessions to achieve trade disciplines in developed countries. We use a global numerical simulation model to compute bargaining outcomes from linked trade and environment negotiations, comparing developed-developing country bargaining only on trade policy with joint bargaining on both trade and domestic environmental policies. Results indicate joint gains from expanding the trade bargaining set to include environment, opposite to the current developing country reluctance to negotiate in the World Trade Organization on this issue. However, compared to bargaining with cash side payments, linking trade and environment through negotiation on policy instruments provides significantly inferior developing country outcomes. Thus, a trade and environment policy-linked negotiation may be better than an environment-only negotiation, but negotiating compensation to developing countries for environmental restraint would be better. We provide sensitivity and further analysis of our results and indicate what other factors could qualify our main finding, including the erosion of the MFN principle involved with environmentally based trade actions.
Notes:
Print version record
October 1997.
Includes bibliographical references.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account