1 option
The U.S. Productivity Slowdown: A Case of Statistical Myopia / Michael R. Darby.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Darby, Michael R.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w1018.
- NBER working paper series no. w1018
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Other Title:
- The U.S. Productivity Slowdown
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1982.
- Summary:
- This paper identifies three major periods: 1900-1929, 1929-1965, and 1965-1978. In contrast to the middle period, the extreme periods are characterized by rapid growth in private employment and hours worked; because growth in private productivity increases by less, measured labor productivity growth falls compared to the middle period. However this fall reflects a substantial substitution of quantity for quality in labor force growth: after private employment and hours are adjusted for age, sex, immigration, and education, no difference is observed among the average quality-adjusted labor productivity growth rates. Substantial variation in these growth rates remains within the 1929-1965 and 1965-1978 periods. Slow quality-adjusted labor productivity growth during 1929-1948 is just offset by unusually rapid growth during 1948-1965; these variations are attributed to the near cessation of investment during the Depression and World War II and subsequent recovery of the capital-labor ratio. Thus no substantial variations in total factor productivity growth or technical progress is found. Variations inproductivity growth within 1965-1978 are explained by price-control induced biases in reported deflated output. Correction of these biases results inequal quality-adjusted labor productivity growth in 1965-1973 and 1973-1978.A substantial program of future research is proposed. A data appendix is included.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- November 1982.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.