My Account Log in

1 option

Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important is Composition Bias / Gary Solon, Robert Barsky, Jonathan A. Parker.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Solon, Gary.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barsky, Robert.
Parker, Jonathan A.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w4202.
NBER working paper series no. w4202
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1992.
Summary:
In the period since the 1960's, as in other periods, aggregate time series on real wages have displayed only modest cyclicality. Macroeconomists therefore have described weak cyclicality of real wages as a salient feature of the business cycle. Contrary to this conventional wisdom, our analysis of longitudinal microdata indicates that real wages have been substantially procyclical since the 1960's. We also find that the substantial procyclicality of men's real wages pertains even to workers that stay with the same employer and that women's real wages are less procyclical than men's. Numerous longitudinal studies besides ours have documented the substantial procyclicality of real wages, but none has adequately explained the discrepancy with the aggregate time series evidence. In accordance with a conjecture by Stockman (I983), we show that the true procyclicality of real wages is obscured in aggregate time series because of a composition bias: the aggregate statistics are constructed in a way that gives more weight to low-skill workers during expansions than during recessions. We conclude that, because real wages actually are much more procyclical than they appear in aggregate statistics, theories designed to explain the supposed weakness of real wage cyclicality may be unnecessary. and theories that predict substantially procyclical real wages become more credible.
Notes:
Print version record
October 1992.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account