My Account Log in

1 option

Voter Response to Peak and End Transfers: Evidence from a Conditional Cash Transfer Experiment / Sebastian Galiani, Nadya Hajj, Patrick J. McEwan, Pablo Ibarraran, Nandita Krishnaswamy.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Galiani, Sebastian.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hajj, Nadya.
McEwan, Patrick J.
Ibarraran, Pablo.
Krishnaswamy, Nandita.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w22588.
NBER working paper series no. w22588
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Voter Response to Peak and End Transfers
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.
Summary:
In a Honduran field experiment, sequences of cash transfers to poor households varied in amount of the largest ("peak") and last ("end") transfers. Larger peak-end transfers increased voter turnout and the incumbent party's vote share in the 2013 presidential election, independently of cumulative transfers. A plausible explanation is that voters succumbed to a common cognitive bias by applying peak-end heuristics. Another is that voters deliberately used peak-end transfers to update beliefs about the incumbent party. In either case, the results provide experimental evidence on the classic non-experimental finding that voters are especially sensitive to recent economic activity.
Notes:
Print version record
September 2016.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account