My Account Log in

1 option

Choice and Consequence : Assessing Mismatch at Chicago Exam Schools / Joshua D. Angrist, Parag A. Pathak & Román Andrés Zárate.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Angrist, Joshua David, author.
Pathak, Parag A., author.
Zárate, Román Andrés, author.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) ; no. w26137.
NBER working paper series ; no. w26137
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
School choice.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (54 pages) : illustrations (black and white).
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Massachusetts : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019.
Summary:
The educational mismatch hypothesis asserts that students are hurt by affirmative action policies that place them in selective schools for which they wouldn't otherwise qualify. We evaluate mismatch in Chicago's selective public exam schools, which admit students using neighborhood-based diversity criteria as well as test scores. Regression discontinuity estimates for applicants favored by affirmative action indeed show no gains in reading and negative effects of exam school attendance on math scores. But these results are similar for more- and less-selective schools and for applicants unlikely to benefit from affirmative-action, a pattern inconsistent with mismatch. We show that Chicago exam school effects are explained by the schools attended by applicants who are not offered an exam school seat. Specifically, mismatch arises because exam school admission diverts many applicants from high-performing Noble Network charter schools, where they would have done well. Consistent with these findings, exam schools reduce Math scores for applicants applying from charter schools in another large urban district. Exam school applicants' previous achievement, race, and other characteristics that are sometimes said to mediate student-school matching play no role in this story.
Notes:
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account