1 option
Competition in or for the Field: Which is Better? / Eduardo Engel, Ronald Fischer, Alexander Galetovic.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Engel, Eduardo.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w8869.
- NBER working paper series no. w8869
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Other Title:
- Competition in or for the Field
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2002.
- Summary:
- In many circumstances, a principal, who wants prices to be as low as possible, must contract with agents who would like to charge the monopoly price. This paper compares a Demsetz auction, which awards an exclusive contract to the agent bidding the lowest price (competition for the field) with having two agents provide the good under (imperfectly) competitive conditions (competition in the field). We obtain a simple sufficient condition showing unambiguously which option is best. The condition depends only on the shapes of the surplus function of the principal and the profit function of agents, and is independent of the particular duopoly game played ex post. We apply this condition to three canonical examples -- procurement, royalty contracts and dealerships -- and find that whenever marginal revenue for the final good is decreasing in the quantity sold, a Demsetz auction is best. Moreover, a planner who wants to maximize social surplus also prefers a Demsetz auction.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- April 2002.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.