My Account Log in

1 option

Arbitrage Or Narrow Bracketing? On Using Money to Measure Intertemporal Preferences / James Andreoni, Christina Gravert, Michael A. Kuhn, Silvia Saccardo, Yang Yang.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Andreoni, James.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gravert, Christina.
Kuhn, Michael A.
Saccardo, Silvia.
Yang, .
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w25232.
NBER working paper series no. w25232
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2018.
Summary:
If experimental subjects arbitrage against market interest rates when making intertemporal allocations of cash, the data will reveal nothing about subjects' discount rates, only uncovering subjects' market interest rates. If they frame choices narrowly, market rates will not be salient and the experiment will uncover subjects' utility discount rates. We test arbitrage directly by forcing all transactions with subjects to be instant electronic bank transfers, thus making arbitrage easy and salient. We also employ four decision frames to test alternative hypotheses. Our evidence contradicts arbitrage, supports money as a valid reward, and suggests framing as a correlate with present bias.
Notes:
Print version record
November 2018.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account