My Account Log in

1 option

The Problem of Data Quality in Analyses of Opioid Regulation: The Case of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs / Jill Horwitz, Corey S. Davis, Lynn S. McClelland, Rebecca S. Fordon, Ellen Meara.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Horwitz, Jill.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Davis, Corey S.
McClelland, Lynn S.
Fordon, Rebecca S.
Meara, Ellen.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w24947.
NBER working paper series no. w24947
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Problem of Data Quality in Analyses of Opioid Regulation
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2018.
Summary:
States, which have the primary legal role in regulating the prescribing and dispensing of prescription medications, have created Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP) to try to reduce inappropriate prescribing, dispensing, and related harm. Research assessing whether these interventions are effective has produced inconclusive and contradictory results. Here we examine whether different data sources may have contributed to the varying results. Specifically, we: 1) identify the decisions inherent in creating such a dataset; 2) discuss the public data sources used by researchers in previous work; 3) develop and apply a detailed research protocol to create a novel PDMP law dataset; and 4) to illustrate potential consequences of data choice, apply various data sources to analyze the relationship between PDMP laws and prescribing and dispensing of opioids among disabled Medicare beneficiaries. We find that our dates differ from those in existing datasets, sometimes by many years. The regression analyses generated a twofold difference in point estimates, as well as different signed estimates, depending on the data used. We conclude that the lack of transparency about data assembly in existing datasets, differences among dates by source, and the regression results raise concerns for PDMP researchers and policymakers.
Notes:
Print version record
August 2018.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account