My Account Log in

1 option

Measurement Error Mechanisms Matter: Agricultural Intensification with Farmer Misperceptions and Misreporting / Kibrom A. Abay, Leah Bevis, Christopher B. Barrett.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Abay, Kibrom A.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bevis, Leah.
Barrett, Christopher B. (Christopher Brendan)
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w26066.
NBER working paper series no. w26066
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Measurement Error Mechanisms Matter
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2019.
Summary:
The mechanism(s) that generate measurement error matter to inference. Survey measurement error is typically thought to represent simple misreporting correctable through improved measurement. But errors might also or alternatively reflect respondent misperceptions that materially affect the respondent decisions under study. We show analytically that these alternate data generating processes imply different appropriate regression specifications and have distinct effects on the bias in parameter estimates. We introduce a simple empirical technique to generate unbiased estimates under more general conditions and to apportion measurement error between misreporting and misperceptions in measurement error when one has both self-reported and objectively-measured observations of the same explanatory variable. We then apply these techniques to the longstanding question of agricultural intensification: do farmers increase input application rates per unit area as the size of the plots they cultivate decreases? Using nationally representative data from four sub-Saharan African countries, we find strong evidence that measurement error in plot size reflects a mixture of farmer misreporting and misperceptions. The results matter to inference around the intensification hypothesis and call into question whether more objective, precise measures are always preferable when estimating behavioral parameters.
Notes:
Print version record
July 2019.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account