My Account Log in

1 option

Government Sponsored versus Private Venture Capital: Canadian Evidence / James A. Brander, Edward Egan , Thomas F. Hellmann.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Brander, James A.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Egan, Edward.
Hellmann, Thomas F.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w14029.
NBER working paper series no. w14029
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Government Sponsored versus Private Venture Capital
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2008.
Summary:
This paper investigates the relative performance of enterprises backed by government-sponsored venture capitalists and private venture capitalists. While previous studies focus mainly on investor returns, this paper focuses on a broader set of public policy objectives, including value-creation, innovation, and competition. A number of novel data-collection methods, including web-crawlers, are used to assemble a near-comprehensive data set of Canadian venture-capital backed enterprises. The results indicate that enterprises financed by government-sponsored venture capitalists underperform on a variety of criteria, including value-creation, as measured by the likelihood and size of IPOs and M&As, and innovation, as measured by patents. It is important to understand whether such underperformance arises from a selection effect in which private venture capitalists have a higher quality threshold for investment than subsidized venture capitalists, or whether it arises from a treatment effect in which subsidized venture capitalists crowd out private investment and, in addition, provide less effective mentoring and other value-added skills. We find suggestive evidence that crowding out and less effective treatment are problems associated with government-backed venture capital. While the data does not allow for a definitive welfare analysis, the results cast some doubt on the desirability of certain government interventions in the venture capital market.
Notes:
Print version record
May 2008.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account