1 option
Social Security in Theory and Practice (II): Efficiency Theories, Narrative Theories, and Implications for Reform / Casey B. Mulligan, Xavier Sala-i-Martin.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Mulligan, Casey B.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w7119.
- NBER working paper series no. w7119
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Other Title:
- Social Security in Theory and Practice
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1999.
- Summary:
- 166 countries have some kind of public old age pension. What economic forces create and sustain old age Social Security as a public program? Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin (1999) document several of the internationally and historically common features of social security programs, and explore political' theories of Social Security. This paper discusses the efficiency theories,' which view creation of the SS program as a full or partial solution to some market failure. Efficiency explanations of social security include the SS as welfare for the elderly', the retirement increases productivity to optimally manage human capital externalities', optimal retirement insurance', the prodigal father problem', the misguided Keynesian', the optimal longevity insurance', the government economizing transaction costs' and the return on human capital investment'. We also analyze four narrative' theories of social security: the chain letter theory', the lump of labor theory', the monopoly capitalism theory', and the Sub-but-Nearly-Optimal policy response to private pensions theory'. The political and efficiency explanations are compared with the international and historical facts and used to derive implications for replacing the typical pay-as-you-go system with a forced savings plan. Most of the explanations suggest that forced savings does not increase welfare, and may decrease it.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- May 1999.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.