1 option
Populists at the Polls: Economic Factors in the 1896 Presidential Election / Barry Eichengreen, Michael R. Haines, Matthew S. Jaremski, David Leblang.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Eichengreen, Barry.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w23932.
- NBER working paper series no. w23932
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Other Title:
- Populists at the Polls
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2017.
- Summary:
- The 1896 presidential election between William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley has gained new salience in the wake of the 2016 contest. We provide the first systematic analysis of voting patterns in 1896, combining county-level returns with economic, financial, demographic and climatological data. Specifically, we consider the economic concerns of the Populists with falling crop prices, high interest rates and railroad monopolies. We show that Bryan did well where mortgage interest rates were high, railroad penetration was low, and crop prices had declined by most over the previous decade. Using our estimates, we show that further declines in crop prices or increases in interest rates would have been enough to tip the Electoral College in Bryan's favor. But to change the outcome, the additional fall in crop prices would have had to be large. The counterfactual increase in interest rates appears, at first blush, to have been more modest. But where previous authors have argued that interest rates came down in the 1890s because of the entry of additional banks, our estimates indicate that bank entry would have had to be very significantly slower to tip the election. There is no question that economic grievances mattered in 1896. But small or even moderate changes in economic conditions would not have changed the outcome of the election.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- October 2017.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.