1 option
Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Re-Analysis of the California GAIN Program / V. Joseph Hotz, Guido W. Imbens, Jacob A. Klerman.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Hotz, V. Joseph.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w11939.
- NBER working paper series no. w11939
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Other Title:
- Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2006.
- Summary:
- In this paper, we explore ways of combining experimental data and non-experimental methods to estimate the differential effects of components of training programs. We show how data from a multi-site experimental evaluation in which subjects are randomly assigned to any treatment versus a control group who receives no treatment can be combined with non-experimental regression-adjustment methods to estimate the differential effects of particular types of treatments. We also devise tests of the validity of using the latter methods. We use these methods and tests to re-analyze data from the MDRC Evaluation of California's Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN) program. While not designed to estimate the differential effects of the Labor Force Attachment (LFA) training and Human Capital Development (HCD) training components used in this program, we show how data from this experimental evaluation can be used in conjunction with non-experimental methods to estimate such effects. We present estimates of both the short- and long-term differential effects of these two training components on employment and earnings. We find that while there are short-term positive differential effects of LFA versus HCD, the latter training component is relatively more beneficial in the longer-term.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- January 2006.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.