My Account Log in

1 option

The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend / W. Kip Viscusi, Richard Zeckhauser.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Viscusi, W. Kip.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zeckhauser, Richard.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w11863.
NBER working paper series no. w11863
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005.
Summary:
Over 250 respondents--graduate students in law and public policy--assessed the risks of climate change and valued climate-change mitigation policies. Many aspects of their behavior were consistent with rational behavior. For example, respondents successfully estimated distributions of temperature increases in Boston by 2100. The median value of best estimates was 1-3 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, people with higher risk estimates, whether for temperature or related risks (e.g., hurricane intensities) offered more to avoid warming. Median willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid global warming was $0.50/gallon, and 3% of income. And important scope tests (e.g., respondents paid more for bigger accomplishments) were passed. However, significant behavioral propensities also emerged. For example, accessibility of neutral information on global warming boosted risk estimates. Warming projections correlated with estimates for unrelated risks, such as earthquakes and heart attacks. The implied WTP for avoidance was much greater when asked as a percent of income than as a gas tax, a percent thinking bias. Home team betting showed itself; individuals predicting a Bush victory predicted smaller temperature increases. In the climate-change arena, behavioral decision tendencies are like a fun-house mirror: They magnify some estimates and shrink others, but the contours of rational decision remain recognizable.
Notes:
Print version record
December 2005.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account