My Account Log in

1 option

Analyzing Social Experiments as Implemented: A Reexamination of the Evidence From the HighScope Perry Preschool Program / James J. Heckman, Seong Hyeok Moon, Rodrigo Pinto, Peter A. Savelyev, Adam Yavitz.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Heckman, James J.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Moon, Seong Hyeok.
Pinto, Rodrigo.
Savelyev, Peter A.
Yavitz, Adam.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w16238.
NBER working paper series no. w16238
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Analyzing Social Experiments as Implemented
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2010.
Summary:
Social experiments are powerful sources of information about the effectiveness of interventions. In practice, initial randomization plans are almost always compromised. Multiple hypotheses are frequently tested. "Significant" effects are often reported with p-values that do not account for preliminary screening from a large candidate pool of possible effects. This paper develops tools for analyzing data from experiments as they are actually implemented. We apply these tools to analyze the influential HighScope Perry Preschool Program. The Perry program was a social experiment that provided preschool education and home visits to disadvantaged children during their preschool years. It was evaluated by the method of random assignment. Both treatments and controls have been followed from age 3 through age 40. Previous analyses of the Perry data assume that the planned randomization protocol was implemented. In fact, as in many social experiments, the intended randomization protocol was compromised. Accounting for compromised randomization, multiple-hypothesis testing, and small sample sizes, we find statistically significant and economically important program effects for both males and females. We also examine the representativeness of the Perry study.
Notes:
Print version record
July 2010.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account