1 option
The SES Health Gradient on Both Sides of the Atlantic / James Banks, Michael Marmot, Zoe Oldfield, James P. Smith.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Banks, James.
- Series:
- Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w12674.
- NBER working paper series no. w12674
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Men--Health and hygiene--United States.
- Men.
- Men--Health and hygiene--Great Britain.
- Men--United States.
- Health Status.
- Men--Great Britain.
- Medical Subjects:
- Men--United States.
- Health Status.
- Men--Great Britain.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2006.
- Summary:
- Looking across many diseases, average health among mature men is much worse in America compared to England. Second, there exists a steep negative health gradient for men in both countries where men at the bottom of the economic hierarchy are in much worse health than those at the top. This health gradient exists whether education, income, or financial wealth is used as the marker of one's SES status. These conclusions are maintained even after controlling for a standard set of behavioral risk factors such as smoking, drinking, and obesity and are equally true using either biological measures of disease or individual self-reports. In contrast to these disease based measures, health of American men appears to be superior to the health of English men when self-reported general health status is used. The contradiction most likely stems instead from different thresholds used by Americans and English when evaluating health status on subjective scales. For the same "objective" health status, Americans are much more likely to say that their health is good than are the English. Finally, feedbacks from new health events to household income are one of the reasons that underlie the strength of the income gradient with health in England.
- Notes:
- Print version record
- November 2006.
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 29-30).
- OCLC:
- 246955992
- Publisher Number:
- 206722 CaOOCEL (Public Documents)
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.