My Account Log in

1 option

Are Two Heads Better Than One?: An Experimental Analysis of Group vs. Individual Decisionmaking / Alan S. Blinder, John Morgan.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Blinder, Alan S.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Morgan, John.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w7909.
NBER working paper series no. w7909
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Are Two Heads Better Than One?
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2000.
Summary:
Two laboratory experiments - one a statistical urn problem, the other a monetary policy experiment - were run to test the commonly-believed hypothesis that groups make decisions more slowly than individuals do. Surprisingly, this turns out not to be true there is no significant difference in average decision lags. Furthermore, and also surprisingly, there is no significant difference in the decision lag when groups decisions are made by majority rule versus when they are made under a unanimity requirement. In addition, group decisions are on average superior to individual decisions. The results are strikingly similar across the two experiments.
Notes:
Print version record
September 2000.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account