Euro-Productivity and Euro-Jobs since the 1960s: Which Institutions Really Mattered? / Gayle Allard, Peter H. Lindert.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Allard, Gayle.

Contributor:

National Bureau of Economic Research.

Lindert, Peter H.

Series:

Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w12460.

NBER working paper series no. w12460

Language:

English

Physical Description:

1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);

Other Title:

Euro-Productivity and Euro-Jobs since the 1960s

Place of Publication:

Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2006.

Summary:

How have labor market institutions and welfare-state transfers affected jobs and productivity in Western Europe, relative to industrialized Pacific Rim countries? Orthodox criticisms of European government institutions are right in some cases and wrong in others. Protectionist labor-market policies such as employee protection laws seem to have become more costly since about 1980, not through overall employment effects, but through the net human-capital cost of protecting senior male workers at the expense of women and youth. Product-market regulations in core sectors may also have reduced GDP, though here the evidence is less robust. By contrast, high general tax levels have shed the negative influence they might have had in the 1960s and 1970s. Similarly, other institutions closer to the core of the welfare state have caused no net harm to European jobs and growth. The welfare state's tax-based social transfers and coordinated wage bargaining have not harmed either employment or GDP. Even unemployment benefits do not have robustly negative effects.

Notes:

Print version record

August 2006.