Is Crowding Out Due Entirely to Fundraising? Evidence from a Panel of Charities / James Andreoni, A. Abigail Payne.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Andreoni, James.

Contributor:

National Bureau of Economic Research.

Payne, A. Abigail.

Series:

Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w16372.

NBER working paper series no. w16372

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Crowding out (Economics).

Charities--Subsidies.

Charities.

Fund raising.

Government aid.

Federal aid.

Physical Description:

1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);

Other Title:

Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising?

Place of Publication:

Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2010.

Summary:

When the government gives a grant to a private charitable organization, do the donors to that organization give less? If they do, is it because the grants crowd out donors who feel they gave through taxes (classic crowd out), or is it because the grant crowds out the fund-raising of the charities who, after getting the grant, reduce efforts of fund-raising (fund-raising crowd out)? This is the first paper to separate these two effects. Using a panel of more than 8,000 charities, we find that crowding out is significant, at about 72 percent. We find this crowding out is due primarily to reduced fund-raising. Depending on which types of organizations are included in the analysis, crowding out attributable to classic crowd-out ranges from 30% to a slight crowd-in effect, while fund-raising crowd out ranges from 70% to over 100% of all crowd out. Such a finding could have important consequences for how governments structure grants to non-profits. Our results indicate, for example, that requirements that charities match a fraction of government grants with increases in private donations might be a feasible policy that could reduce the detrimental effects of crowding out.

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Background

3. The Nonprofit data set

4. Estimation strategy

5. Estimation

6. Robustness of results

7. Discussion

7. Conclusion

References.

Notes:

Print version record

September 2010.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 25-27).

OCLC:

758076981

Publisher Number:

226150 CaOOCEL (Public Documents)