My Account Log in

1 option

Information, Learning, and Drug Diffusion: the Case of Cox-2 Inhibitors / Pradeep Chintadunta, Renna Jiang, Ginger Z. Jin.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Chintadunta, Pradeep.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jiang, Renna.
Jin, Ginger Z.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w14252.
NBER working paper series no. w14252
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Information, Learning, and Drug Diffusion
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2008.
Summary:
The recent withdrawal of Cox-2 Inhibitors has generated debate on the role of information in drug diffusion: can the market learn the efficacy of new drugs, or does it depend solely on manufacturer advertising and FDA updates? In this study, we use a novel data set to study the diffusion of three Cox-2 Inhibitors ? Celebrex, Vioxx and Bextra ? before the Vioxx withdrawal. Our study has two unique features: first, we observe each patient?s reported satisfaction after consuming a drug. This patient level data set, together with market level data on FDA updates, media coverage, academic articles, and pharmaceutical advertising, allows us to model individual prescription decisions. Second, we distinguish across-patient learning of a drug?s general efficacy from the within-patient learning of the match between a drug and a patient. Our results suggest that prescription choice is sensitive to many sources of information. At the beginning of 2001 and upon Bextra entry in January 2002, doctors held a strong prior belief about the efficacy of Celebrex, Vioxx, and Bextra. As a result, the learning from patient satisfaction is gradual and more concentrated on drug-patient match than on across-patient spillovers. News articles are weakly beneficial for Cox-2 drug sales, but academic articles appear to be detrimental. The impact of FDA updates is close to zero once we control for academic articles, which suggests that FDA updates follow academic articles and therefore deliver little new information to doctors. We find that drug advertising also influences the choice of a patient?s medication. A number of counterfactual experiments are carried out to quantify the influence of information on market shares.
Notes:
Print version record
August 2008.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account