My Account Log in

1 option

The Bias of the RSR Estimator and the Accuracy of Some Alternatives / William N. Goetzmann, Liang Peng.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Goetzmann, William N.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Peng, Liang.
Series:
Technical Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. t0270.
NBER technical working paper series no. t0270
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2001.
Summary:
This paper analyzes the implications of cross-sectional heteroskedasticity in repeat sales regression (RSR). RSR estimators are essentially geometric averages of individual asset returns because of the logarithmic transformation of price relatives. We show that the cross sectional variance of asset returns affects the magnitude of bias in the average return estimate for that period, while reducing the bias for the surrounding periods. It is not easy to use an approximation method to correct the bias problem. We suggest a maximum-likelihood alternative to the RSR that directly estimates index returns that are analogous to the RSR estimators but are arithmetic averages of individual returns. Simulations show that these estimators are robust to time-varying cross-sectional variance and may be more accurate than RSR and some alternative methods of RSR.
Notes:
Print version record
April 2001.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account