My Account Log in

1 option

Earnings Inequality and Coordination Costs: Evidence From U.S. Law Firms / Luis Garicano, Thomas Hubbard.

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Garicano, Luis.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hubbard, Thomas.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w14741.
NBER working paper series no. w14741
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Earnings Inequality and Coordination Costs
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2009.
Summary:
Earnings inequality has increased substantially since the 1970s. Using evidence from confidential Census data on U.S. law offices on lawyers' organization and earnings, we study the extent to which the mechanism suggested by Lucas (1978) and Rosen (1982), a scale of operations effect linking spans of control and earnings inequality, is responsible increases in inequality. We first show that earnings inequality among lawyers increased substantially between 1977 and 1992, and that the distribution of partner-associate ratios across offices changed in ways consistent with the hypothesis that coordination costs fell during this period. We then propose a "hierarchical production function" in which output is the product of skill and time and estimate its parameters, applying insights from the equilibrium assignment literature. We find that coordination costs fell broadly and steadily during this period, so that hiring one's first associate leveraged a partner's skill by about 30% more in 1992 than 1977. We find also that changes in lawyers' hierarchical organization account for about 2/3 of the increase in earnings inequality among lawyers in the upper tail, but a much smaller share of the increase in inequality between lawyers in the upper tail and other lawyers. These findings indicate that new organizational efficiencies potentially explain increases in inequality, especially among individuals toward the top of the earnings distribution.
Notes:
Print version record
February 2009.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account