1 option
Restraint Systems Comparison in Frontal Crashes Using a Living Animal Laboratoire des Chocs et de BiomécaniqueONSER
- Format:
- Conference/Event
- Author/Creator:
- Dejeammes, M., author.
- Conference Name:
- 1980 Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition (1980-02-25 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 1980
- Summary:
- Since the three point belt appeared, many improvements were searched. With the aim of estimating their efficiency, a comparative study, choosing a living subject - the baboon - has been carried out. The static three-point belt being the reference, the restraint systems were tested in frontal impacts at 14 m/s (50 km/h) and more.Besides classical biomechanical criteria, the lesion finding and the baboon stress led us to the conclusion that: 1 - the pre-inflated belt gives the most favourable results, 2 - the load-limited belt is not easy to be adjusted, 3 - the pre-loaded belt has an efficiency much dependent on the crash detection and 4 - the automatic retractor belt shows a "film spool" effect that may be unfavourable. Moreover, this study gave indications on the biomechanical criteria credibility
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Publisher Number:
- 800297
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.