My Account Log in

1 option

The Warm Compaction Process.Basics, Advantages and Limitations

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Bocchini, G. Filippo, author.
Conference Name:
International Congress & Exposition (1998-02-23 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 1998
Summary:
The origins of the new compacting method are surveyed. The densification enhancement derives from yield strength drop versus temperature and from a most effective lubrication mechanism. For any mix the pore free density figures out the limit density after compaction. The allowances corresponding to volume increase on ejection are evaluated. The curves of porosity versus compaction pressure show that graphite additions can contribute to densification. For part shapes with upper profiles replicating the upper punch faces, the porosity distribution attained by warm compaction is better than that attained by room temperature compaction. The changes with respect to room temperature compaction bring about a higher radial pressure at densification end but a lower residual radial pressure at ejection start. These are the reasons for a relatively high spring-back but low ejection strength. The low porosity of compacts obliges to reexamine the thermal profile on sintering, because permeability to reducing gases strongly decreases. To avoid embedding of oxide flakes the refining stage of sintering should be adequately long. High thickness P/M parts can be undersintered at the core, if the reducing gases cannot reach their most internal sites. The new concept of reduction depth is introduced. The bonds linked to new (high Mo) fully prealloyed powders, which can allow a completely ferritic sintering, are examined. The analysis of powder properties shows the importance of a reduced inclusion content in case of warm compaction and very law sintered porosity. Finally, the tools operating conditions are reviewed and the differences with respect to room temperature compaction are underlined. The needs for an innovative and sophisticated design calculation, and for a suitable EDM procedure for dies as well, are discussed and summarized
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
980334
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account