My Account Log in

1 option

Comparison of the Exhaust Emissions from California Phase 1 (without oxygenates) and Phase 2 (with oxygenates) Fuel:A Case Study of 11 Passenger Vehicles California Air Resources Board

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Chou, David C., author.
Conference Name:
International Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition (1996-05-06 : Dearborn, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 1996
Summary:
While most studies addressing the fuel effects are based on the Federal Test Procedure (FTP), there are limited studies investigating the fuel effects outside FTP test conditions. In this study, we investigated the differences in exhaust emissions from California Phase 1 to Phase 2 reformulated gasoline over a wide range of speed and ambient temperatures. Eleven catalyst equipped passenger vehicles were tested. The vehicles were comprised of three fuel delivery system configurations, namely, three from carburetor (CARBU), three from throttle body injection (TBI), and five from multi-port fuel injection (MPFI) group. Each vehicle was given 60 tests with the combination of two reformulated fuels: Phase 1 (without oxygenates) and Phase 2 (with oxygenates), three temperatures (50, 75, and 100 °F), and ten speed cycles (average speed ranges from 4 mph to 65 mph). In other words, each vehicle has 30 pairs of Phase 1 and Phase 2 tests under the identical speed and temperature conditions and a total of 330 pairs of test data were analyzed.Paired t-tests were used to analyze the exhaust emissions data from Phase 1 and Phase 2 fuel. The overall exhaust emissions reduction (based on all vehicles) from Phase 1 to Phase 2 fuel for HC, CO, NOx were 17%, 13%, and 11%, respectively. However, only HC and NOx exhaust emissions reduction were found to be statistically significant (α = 0.05). In general, the exhaust emissions reduction derived from this case study is in good agreement with the emissions reduction predicted by the emission factor model (EMFAC) of the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
961221
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account