My Account Log in

1 option

Determining the Distribution of Battery Electric and Fuel Cell Electric Buses in a Metropolitan Public Transport Network Queen's University Belfast

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Blades, Luke Aubrey William, author.
Contributor:
Cunningham, G. M.
Early, Juliana
MacNeill, Rachel
Zhang, Yuanjian
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2022-04-05 : Detroit & Online, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2022
Summary:
The need to decrease greenhouse gases emissions in the transport sector has resulted in the requirement for zero emission technologies in city centre bus fleets. Currently, battery electric buses are the most common choice, with both single deck and double deck vehicles in regular use. However, long-term operational capabilities are still largely unknown and unreported. Hydrogen fuel cell electric buses are an emerging zero emission technology that have the potential to complement a battery electric bus fleet where the duty cycle is challenging for current battery electric configurations. This paper compares the difference in energy consumption, for a given chassis configuration, passenger load, and heating requirement, of generic battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell electric buses operating in a typical UK city environment. A methodology was employed that will provide bus operators with a robust mechanism to inform buying decisions, based on their route characteristics, when transitioning to a zero-emission fleet. Simulations performed using battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell electric models showed that the hydrogen fuel cell electric bus has a much higher predicted range (465 km) and operating time (23.1 hours) than the battery electric equivalent (273 km and 13.5 hours) when considering a duty cycle of mixed city operation. While the hydrogen fuel cell vehicle showed limited variation in the range across all drive cycles considered, the battery electric bus showed a high percentage decrease (16.4%) in range when subjected to drive cycles with higher average road gradient. Meanwhile, when considering operation on a drive cycle with 0% average road gradient, the battery electric bus was predicted to have a percentage increase in range of 12.5%. This study shows that when considering a zero-emission vehicle technology mix, the characteristics of the service routes should be considered before deciding which powertrain configuration to utilise on each route
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2022-01-0675
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account