1 option
Leveraging Risk Tolerances and Simple Kinematics to Quantify Fault Tolerant Time Intervals for Commercial Trucks Eaton Cummins Automated Transmission Tech
- Format:
- Book
- Conference/Event
- Author/Creator:
- Jones, Darren K., author.
- Conference Name:
- SAE WCX Digital Summit (2021-04-13 : Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States)
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource cm
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 2021
- Summary:
- The ISO 26262 series of standards for vehicle functional safety codify requirements to avoid unreasonable risk from the failure of electrical or electronic (E/E) systems. E/E failures may cause malfunctioning behavior that manifest as vehicle-level hazardous events. The ISO 26262 second edition includes commercial trucking, which employs significant variation from the passenger car development cycle. The highly distributed nature of E/E system development and integration in commercial trucks complicates forging unified safety concepts. For instance, the Fault Tolerant Time Interval (FTTI) quantifies the minimum time span from the occurrence of a fault to the possible occurrence of a hazardous event. Often, the subjectivity involved in defining unreasonable risk and hazardous event onset frustrates consensus among stakeholders. In order to provide some uniformity in the adoption of ISO 26262 across the commercial truck industry, this paper introduces the Risk Threshold (RT) Method to clarify the boundary between acceptable and unreasonable risk. RT is defined as the acceptable travel distance caused by a malfunctioning behavior. The RT Method includes:This paper applies the RT Method to four key hazards: unintended acceleration, unintended motion, unintended direction, and increased stopping distance. For ease of illustration, all motion described in this paper aligns with a truck's longitudinal axis. The RT Method correlates FTTI to hazardous event onset using objective and repeatable measurements. For commercial trucks, consistently predictable velocity during the FTTI facilitates this correlation. The simplicity of this approach enables stakeholder comparison of differing risk tolerances in terms of RT. Driving consensus on RT then yields a corresponding FTTI
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Publisher Number:
- 2021-01-0066
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.