My Account Log in

1 option

Detailed Emissions Characterization for Off-Road Applications: A DPF and non-DPF Engine Comparison Southwest Research Institute

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Zavala, Bryan, author.
Contributor:
Premnath, Vinay
Sharp, Christopher
Conference Name:
WCX SAE World Congress Experience (2022-04-05 : Detroit & Online, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2022
Summary:
As agencies continue to focus on emissions compliance, low NOX discussions have started to propagate beyond the on-highway market. Nonroad applications, which contribute to 29% of the PM emissions and 11% of the NOX emissions in California, are being reviewed to understand the technological challenges and requirements for improved emissions performance. To help facilitate a nonroad low NOX technology demonstration, information from current engine and aftertreatment technologies required a detailed assessment. The following work will discuss the emissions characterization results from two non-road engine platforms. The intention of this study was to compare the emissions species from different approaches designed to meet Tier 4 emissions regulations. The platforms reflect available technology for DPF and non-DPF aftertreatment architectures. A detailed emissions characterization included gaseous emissions, particulate matter, particle number, and an extensive list of non-regulated emission measurements (e.g. volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and water-soluble organic carbon). The engines were evaluated utilizing certification cycles, as well as, a low load application cycle developed from field applications. Results from this study indicate that while both applications meet Tier 4 regulations, each engine platform has associated challenges. For example, the non-DPF engine reduces PM by 40% to 50%, while the DPF engine can reduce PM by 95% or more. The non-DPF engine, however, had better low load NOX reduction performance at 82% compared to the DPF engine at 67%. The tradeoff, though, was higher CO2 emissions for the non-DPF engine. This work will provide valuable inputs to engine and aftertreatment simulation models, which will be utilized to evaluate candidate low NOX aftertreatment architectures
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2022-01-0585
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account