My Account Log in

1 option

Sensor Fusion Approach for Dynamic Torque Estimation with Low Cost Sensors for Boosted 4-Cylinder Engine Michigan Technological University

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Heyne Minehart, Cooper, author.
Contributor:
Archer, Chad
Blough, Jason
Glugla, Chris
Naber, Jeffrey
Wang, Xin
Conference Name:
SAE WCX Digital Summit (2021-04-13 : Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2021
Summary:
As the world searches for ways to reduce humanity's impact on the environment, the automotive industry looks to extend the viable use of the gasoline engine by improving efficiency. One way to improve engine efficiency is through more effective control. Torque-based control is critical in modern cars and trucks for traction control, stability control, advanced driver assistance systems, and autonomous vehicle systems. Closed loop torque-based engine control systems require feedback signal(s); indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) is a useful signal but is costly to measure directly with in-cylinder pressure sensors. Previous work has been done in torque and IMEP estimation using crankshaft acceleration and ion sensors, but these systems lack accuracy in some operating ranges and the ability to estimate cycle-cycle variation. In this study, we show that a data driven system to estimate IMEP using frequency content of crank acceleration, exhaust pressure, and ion current with optimized data windowing can effectively estimate individual cylinder cycle-cycle variation in IMEP over some engine operating regions. Fourier Transforms are used to extract features from the angle domain sensors that are useful for IMEP estimation. A neural network is used to estimate IMEP from those features. Pattern search and grid search algorithms are used to optimize feature extraction, network structure, and network training hyper-parameters with dual objectives of minimizing error and network complexity. These derivative free optimization techniques drove the IMEP estimation error down to 16 kPa over a transient drive cycle (using production possible sensors) and allow it to estimate cycle-cycle variation in some conditions
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2021-01-0418
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account