My Account Log in

1 option

On the Effects of Parallelization on the Flow Prediction around a Fastback DrivAer Model at Different Attitudes University of North Carolina Charlotte

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Misar, Adit Sunil, author.
Contributor:
Ahani, Hamed
Bounds, Charles
Uddin, Mesbah
Zafar, Muhammad Usman
Conference Name:
SAE WCX Digital Summit (2021-04-13 : Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2021
Summary:
When Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used in the development of road vehicles for passenger and performance use, the fidelity and numerical accuracy of the simulation are paramount as manufacturers strive to optimize the vehicle down to the single aerodynamic count. While much research has been performed on how the choices of simulation model or grid size affects the simulation results, very little has been done to investigate how the spatial decomposition of the domain amongst different nodes of a high-performance computing unit (HPC) influences the results of the simulation. As simulations grow larger, more nodes are required to reduce the simulation time, however in most commercial software this introduces a new form of error due to the accumulation of round-off errors created in the intra-node communication schemes used during iterations. This study investigates this issue by testing the repeatability and accuracy of a generic passenger car simulation using a state-of-the-art HPC along with a commercially available CFD software. This was accomplished using a readily available generic passenger vehicle body known as the DrivAer model along with the commercial software StarCCM+ which uses a Message Passing Interface (MPI) to compute solutions across many different cores in a parallel load balancing fashion. A methodology was created which tested the simulation's ability to create accurate and reproducible predictions in complex pitch and yaw configurations as the number of computing cores varied
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2021-01-0965
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account