My Account Log in

1 option

Accuracy and Validation of Geotab GPS Fleet Tracking Devices Momentum Engineering Corporation

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Morales, Roberto C., author.
Contributor:
Bonsall, Jeffrey
Gamboa, Jason
Nguyen, Benjamin
Siddiqui, Omair
Conference Name:
SAE WCX Digital Summit (2021-04-13 : Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2021
Summary:
Fleet management companies have implemented tracking devices in their vehicles that employ Global Positioning Systems (GPS) in near real time for optimizing fuel consumption, smart routes, and for monitoring driving behavior. For this purpose, Geotab Incorporated has developed the OBD-II connected Geotab GO device. These devices are capable of recording vehicle position and speed data using GPS. The present study seeks to validate and compare Geotab recorded data to data collected from a VBOX 3i RTK DGPS; this instrumentation will provide a reliable reference for vehicle position and speed. Additional data logging characteristics such as LTE connectivity, Geotab's proprietary curve logging algorithm, near-real-time vehicle data, and speed interpolation were analyzed. This study considered two Geotab models, the GO8 and GO9. Both devices were connected in parallel using two sets of two-way splitters connected to the test vehicle's OBD-II portrait The GO8, GO9, and VBOX 3i RTK, logged data simultaneously and independently. The present study was performed to provide insight for accident reconstructionists investigating crashes involving vehicles equipped with Geotab GO devices.Four different test scenarios were utilized. Scenario 1, Run 1 consisted of a vehicle traveling in a straight line at 45 mph, slowing to a stop, and then performing a left turn maneuver. Scenario 1, Run 2 was conducted in the same manner as Scenario 1, Run 1 except at 65 mph. Scenario 2 consisted of a Stop-Go-Stop-Go-Stop routine in a straight line. Scenario 3 consisted of accelerating in a straight line, then stopping for 3 minutes, and subsequently accelerating. Scenario 4 consisted of four left turn maneuvers around a block. Calculated results for all scenarios showed 11.86 ft in average positional error and ±3.40% in average speed error for speeds greater than 10 mph for the GO8. For the GO9, the results were 8.35 ft in average positional error and ±3.45% in average speed error for speeds greater than 10 mph. Recorded speed was more accurate when the vehicle was traveling faster than 10 mph
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2021-01-0908
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account