My Account Log in

1 option

Study of Effects of Deposit Formation on GDi Injector and Engine Performance Afton Chemical, Limited

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Pilbeam, Jonathan James, author.
Contributor:
Liu, Haoye
Sahu, Amrit B.
Thomson, Alex Robert
Xu, Hongming
Conference Name:
SAE Powertrains, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting (2020-09-22 : Krakow, Poland)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2020
Summary:
Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) vehicles now make up the majority of majority of European new car sales and vehicles in the car parc. Despite delivering measurable engine efficiency benefits, GDI fuel systems are not without issues. Fuel injectors are susceptible to the formation of deposits in and around the injector nozzles holes. It's widely reported that these deposits can affect engine performance and that different fuels can alleviate the build-up of those deposits.This project aims to understand the underlying mechanisms of how deposit formation ultimately leads to a reduction in vehicle performance. Ten GDI fuel injectors, with differing levels of coking were taken from engine testing and consumer vehicles and compared using a range of imaging and engine tests.At the time of writing, a new GDI engine test is being developed by the Co-ordinating European Council (CEC) to be used by the fuel and fuel additive industry. One such test was used to pre-condition six of the injectors in this study. It was found that injectors run in this test without fuel additive experienced significant deposit formation. The use of fuel with Deposit Control Additives (DCA) was found to reverse that effect.This study builds significantly on an earlier paper (SAE 2019-28-2392), adding data from more injectors and single cylinder engine testing. This additional content brings new insights and helps to put that earlier work into greater context.The CEC test is a well-controlled steady state test, which allowed a straight-forward comparison of the different injectors. Despite only being a steady-state test, the test point of 2000rpm / 56Nm was considered realistic and one that occurs regularly in real driving and vehicle emissions testing
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2020-01-2099
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account