My Account Log in

1 option

A Comparison of EGR Condensate Composition between EGR and Dedicated-EGR Combustion Strategies Southwest Research Institute

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Kalaskar, Vickey, author.
Contributor:
Chadwell, Christopher
Conway, Graham
Gukelberger, Raphael
Kroll, Svitlana
Randolph, Eric
Conference Name:
SAE WCX Digital Summit (2021-04-13 : Live Online, Pennsylvania, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2021
Summary:
Water injection is an effective method for knock control in spark-ignition engines. However, the requirement of a separate water source and the cost and complexity associated with a fully integrated system creates a limitation of this method to be used in volume production engines. The engine exhaust typically contains 10-15% water vapor by volume which could be condensed and potentially stored for future use. In this study, the exhaust condensate composition was assessed for its use as an effective replacement for distilled water. Specifically, condensate samples were collected pre and post-three-way catalyst (TWC) and analyzed for acidity and composition. The composition of the pre and post-TWC condensates was found to be similar however, the pre-TWC condensate was mildly acidic. The mild acidity has the potential to corrode certain components in the intake air circuit.The study was further extended to include condensate analysis from an engine operating a dedicated-EGR (D-EGR) strategy running on two similar octane number, E0 and E85 fuels. These condensate samples were compared with a baseline and 0% EGR case. The analysis revealed increased concentrations of nitrite, acetate, and ammonium for D-EGR condensate samples compared to the traditional 25% EGR operation for both E0 and E85 fuels. None of the samples obtained exhibited acidic properties based on their pH values in this second part of the study. Ion analysis of the condensates revealed exhibited lower cation and anion concentrations for the E85 fuel compared to the E0 fuel for 25% conventional and D-EGR condensates. Further, the overall cation and anion formation were higher for the 25% rich D-EGR stream compared to the 25% stoichiometric EGR which was counter-intuitive to the pH measurement of the condensate samples
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2021-01-0484
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account