My Account Log in

1 option

Experimental Investigation on the Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of n-Butanol / GTL and n-Butanol/Diesel Blends in a Single-Cylinder MD-CI Engine Georgia Southern University

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Muinos, Muinos, author.
Contributor:
Gaubert, Remi
Molina, Gustavo
Moncada, José
Soloiu, Valentin
Williams, Johnnie
Conference Name:
WCX 17: SAE World Congress Experience (2017-04-04 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2017
Summary:
AbstractIn this study, the combustion and emissions characteristics of n-butanol/GTL and n-butanol/ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) blends are compared in a single-cylinder experimental diesel engine. The n-butanol was blended with a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel, at 25% and 50% mass. N-butanol was also blended with ULSD at the same mass ratios. FT fuels are an attractive alternative to petroleum based fuels because they can be used as a drop-in fuel with existing infrastructure. N-butanol is renewable fuel capable of being produced from waste biomass sources.The investigations were conducted at 1500 rpm and three loads of 2.75, 4.75, and 6.75 IMEP, representative for the research engine. 15% exhaust gas recirculation was utilized along with a supercharger to increase the intake pressure to 1.2 bar absolute. Neat ULSD and GTL, respectively, were investigated as a baseline. For all loads, the combustion pressures increased as the concentration of n-butanol in the blends increased. As a result of the lower cetane number (CN) of GTL, the GTL fuel and blends exhibited lower peak combustion pressures and heat release rates, when compared to the ULSD and ULSD blends.The low CN of n-butanol led to increased ignition delays for all blends from 1.0 to 1.9 manuscript Although there was an observed extended ignition delay for the blends, CA50 occurred earlier for each blend when compared to the neat fuels.The GTL/n-butanol blends reduced soot by nearly 90%. However, neat GTL showed a considerable increase in soot when compared to ULSD. The GTL/n-butanol blends also produced 20% less NOx when compared to ULSD. At each tested engine load, the 50% n-butanol/50% GTL fuel blend (by mass) resulted in a simultaneous reduction in soot and NOX. The GTL fuel, which lacks aromatics aided in NOX reductions while the oxygenated n-butanol fuel further oxidized the particulate matter.The results indicate that the n-butanol blends are capable of controlling harmful emission formation while maintaining consistent engine operation. Further studies will include injection timing sweeps and increased injection pressure to control NOX formation
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2017-01-0719
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account