My Account Log in

1 option

Integrating STPA into ISO 26262 Process for Requirement Development Ford Motor Company, MIT

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Suo, Suo, author.
Contributor:
Boesch, Mathew
Post, Kyle
Yako, Sarra
Conference Name:
WCX 17: SAE World Congress Experience (2017-04-04 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2017
Summary:
Developing requirements for automotive electric/electronic systems is challenging, as those systems become increasingly software-intensive. Designs must account for unintended interactions among software features, combined with unforeseen environmental factors. In addition, engineers have to iteratively make architectural tradeoffs and assign responsibilities to each component in the system to accommodate new safety requirements as they are revealed. ISO 26262 is an industry standard for the functional safety of automotive electric/electronic systems. It specifies various processes and procedures for ensuring functional safety, but does not limit the methods that can be used for hazard and safety analysis. System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a new technique for hazard analysis, in the sense that hazards are caused by unsafe interactions between components (including humans) as well as component failures and faults. Otherwise stated, STPA covers the safety analysis of system malfunctions as well as the safety of the intended function (SOTIF), in addition to Functional Safety..This paper introduces a process map with a complete meta-model based on Systems Model Language (SysML) to support the integration of STPA into the functional safety process based on ISO 26262. In particular, the paper illustrates how STPA can help evaluate safety and other system-level goals with ASIL classifications from ISO26262's recommended Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA). The meta-model can be also used to provide guidance on making architectural decisions in order to create functional safety requirements. To make the process map applicable to different functional safety processes adopted by OEMs, tool support is required. Guidelines on how to develop visualization tools based on the meta-model are given
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2017-01-0058
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account