My Account Log in

1 option

Impact of Pre-Study Exploration on System Usability Scale and Task Success Rates for Automotive Interfaces Ford Motor Company

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Chandran, Chandran, author.
Contributor:
Allanson, Kathleen
Bittick, Carrie
Brinda, Fnu
Erupaka, Santosh
Forbes, James
Conference Name:
WCX 17: SAE World Congress Experience (2017-04-04 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2017
Summary:
Measurement of usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) is successfully applied to products in many industries. The benefit of any measurement scale, however, is limited by the repeatability of the associated testing process. For SUS, these factors can include sample size, study protocol, previous experience, and pre study exposure to the system being tested. Differences in user exposure can influence the usability assessment of interfaces which could affect the validity of SUS scores. A customer clinic was conducted on a steering wheel/instrument cluster and a center display screen, to see the difference in SUS scores of participants with "Free Exploration (participant had a few minutes to interact with the system)", "Guided Exploration (participant was given a couple of tasks prior to the study)", "No Exploration (no interaction prior to the study)" and "Repeated task Exploration (tasks were asked again after the no exploration phase concluded)" in a between subject design study. All four scenarios were analyzed for their impact on SUS score, task success rates and adjective rating. Under the "No Exploration" test method the estimates of mean SUS score, adjective rating and task success rates are reliable and repeatable with a good correlation to external quality metrics
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2017-01-1385
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account