My Account Log in

1 option

Repeated Measures Testing of Driver Collision Warning Ford Motor Company

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Tijerina, Tijerina, author.
Contributor:
Blommer, Michael
Curry, Reates
Kochhar, Dev
Swaminathan, Radhakrishnan
Talamonti, Walter
Conference Name:
SAE 2015 World Congress & Exhibition (2015-04-21 : Detroit, Michigan, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2015
Summary:
AbstractThis paper investigates the effects on response time of a forward collision event in a repeated-measures design. Repeated-measures designs are often used in forward collision warning (FCW) testing despite concerns that the first exposure creates expectancy effects that may dilute or bias future outcomes. For this evaluation, 32 participants were divided into groups of 8 for an AA, BB, AB, BA design (A= No Warning; B=FCW alert). They drove in a high-fidelity simulator with a visual distraction task. After driving 15 min in a nighttime rural highway environment, a forward collision threat arose during the distraction task (Period 1). A second drive was then run and the forward collision threat was repeated again after 10 min (Period 2). The response times from these consecutive events were analyzed. The results indicated there was differential carryover and significant Period 1 vs. 2 effects that diluted the magnitude of difference between FCW and No Warning treatments relative to first exposure only. Also, there was a non-significant trend suggesting that previous trials with FCW can slow responses on later trials with no FCW. The findings suggest that driver warning HMI evaluations should exercise care in using repeated exposures to low-probability critical events. Researchers should explore carryover effects when repeated-measures designs are used, or else avoid repeated exposures to low-probability, unexpected critical events altogether
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2015-01-1413
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account