1 option
Efficiency Test for Radiator-Fan-Type Air-Cleaners
- Format:
- Other
- Author/Creator:
- Hoffman, A. H., author.
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Place of Publication:
- Warrendale, PA SAE International 1927
- Summary:
- SINCE air-cleaners of the radiator-fan type cannot be tested satisfactorily by the older method, in which a known weight of dust is fed directly into the airstream entering the air-cleaner, a special method was found necessary in which the air-cleaner under test is mounted in its normal position behind a radiator fan that is located inside of an elliptical wind-tunnel within which the fan circulates air. A tractor engine running at constant speed and load drives the fan in the wind-tunnel and draws the air for its carbureter from the wind-tunnel through the air-cleaner under test and an absolute air-cleaner connected in series.A 100-gram charge of a standardized dust is introduced into the wind-tunnel. By averaging the results obtained from repeated tests, using three different collecting-type dry centrifugal air-cleaners, it is found that under normal conditions 15 per cent of the total dust-charge actually reaches the air-cleaner under test in the described apparatus. Therefore, 15 grams is the basis on which the efficiencies of dust separation are calculated. With one exception, the air-cleaners tested showed rather low efficiency. The vacuum or restriction effects, measured by the usual open U-tube manometer, were found low and were unaffected by accumulation of dust except in the case of two air-cleaners. The test method and the apparatus described can be used to test air-cleaners of practically any type, but the accuracy is less than that of the older method. Descriptions of the air-cleaners, tables of summarized data, and numerous observations are presented
- Notes:
- Vendor supplied data
- Publisher Number:
- 270038
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.