My Account Log in

1 option

Methanol Evaporation in an Engine Intake Runner under Various Conditions Ghent University

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Pu, Yi-Hao, author.
Contributor:
Paepe, Michel de
Larsson, Tara
Robeyn, Tom
Verhelst, Sebastian
Conference Name:
16th International Conference on Engines & Vehicles (2023-09-10 : Capri, Italy)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2023
Summary:
Methanol has recently emerged as a promising fuel for internal combustion engines due to its multiple carbon-neutral production routes and advantageous properties when combusting. Methanol is intrinsically more suitable for spark-ignition (SI) operation thanks to its high octane number, but its potential in heavy-duty applications also encourages engine manufacturers in this field to retrofit their existing compression-ignition products into methanol/diesel dual-fuel (DF) operation. For both SI operation and DF operation, injecting methanol into the engine's intake path at low pressure is a relatively simple and robust method to introduce methanol into the cylinders. However, the much higher heat of vaporization (HoV) of methanol compared to conventional SI fuels like gasoline can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, its enhanced cooling effect may increase volumetric efficiency and lower knock tendency, on the other hand, the extra heat it absorbs when evaporating may pose cold-start issues and lead to unstable combustion. To further investigate, a special experimental setup was built. Multiple thermocouples were mounted on an intake runner where the fuel is injected to monitor the temperature changes of the flow before and after injection. The temperature of the runner itself was also monitored to assess the heat taken from the metal wall of the runner pipe. Different air-fuel ratios, air temperatures, air pressures, and air mass flow rates were tested to evaluate their influences on methanol evaporation. The test results were then compared with conventional gasoline operation. It was found that the temperature drop after fuel injection is strongly dependent on the flow temperature, and that the evaporated fraction of methanol was far lower than that of gasoline even with higher flow temperature. Their very different evaporation behaviors are thoroughly discussed
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2023-24-0018
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account