My Account Log in

1 option

Intelligent Decision-Making Policies of Aircraft Assembly Based on Experts Tacit Knowledge Zhengzhou University, School of Management

SAE Technical Papers (1906-current) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Author/Creator:
Miah, Md Helal, author.
Contributor:
Zhang, Jianhua
Conference Name:
2023 AeroTech (2023-03-14 : Fort Worth, Texas, United States)
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource cm
Place of Publication:
Warrendale, PA SAE International 2023
Summary:
Regarding the development of an aircraft assembly process, this paper will illustrate the intelligent decision and policies of the aircraft assembly process based on technician experience. A model of the knowledge management system of the aircraft assembly process is developed to avoid the complexity of the entire aircraft or aircraft product assembly process. Firstly, According to the characteristics of the knowledge management system of the aircraft assembly process, the aircraft assembly process has been discussed to realize the decision of the aircraft assembly process. Secondly, intelligent decision-making in the aircraft assembly process has been established based on the knowledge management system and aircraft assembly process library that is oriented to the assembly process requirements employing an assembly process reasoning method. Finally, the intelligent decision policies of the aircraft assembly process are based on tacit knowledge, which is applied to the decision-making for the "Rapid Prototype" (RP) process selection for a benchmark test part as designed by Fahad and Hopkinson employing the ranking-based method. Based on the descending values of these appraisal scores, the final ranking of RP processes is obtained. The ranking sequence of RP processes according to the "Intelligent Decision" method is A1 > A5 > A4 > A3 > A2, indicating A1 (SLA-7000) as the best choice. The research has practical value in completing the aircraft/aircraft product assembly process concerning a different form of logic, taking into account the existence of various criteria, opposing goals of the decision-making process, subjective character of the assessment process, and involvement of many decision-making
Notes:
Vendor supplied data
Publisher Number:
2023-01-0981
Access Restriction:
Restricted for use by site license

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account